)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"cef7963c5cea0efae032b6d49d72f73884eb0ac6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0b921297_b49e1089","updated":"2026-01-04 07:02:36.000000000","message":"Going to be replaced by\n9180: target: introduce active_polled flag in struct target | https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/9180","commit_id":"1157795f9f6cea2b9cfad7d92a5e17114bc7a27c"},{"author":{"_account_id":1002049,"name":"Erwan Gouriou","email":"erwan.gouriou@st.com","username":"erwango"},"change_message_id":"be9b5fb02bbe42d78b89a17ce1f082319a272e9a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"742d0861_c07078b0","updated":"2022-09-29 13:00:27.000000000","message":"I confirm this revert fixes a wide impact issue seen on Zephyr RTOS.","commit_id":"1157795f9f6cea2b9cfad7d92a5e17114bc7a27c"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000863,"name":"Tarek BOCHKATI","email":"tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com","username":"BouchkatiTarek"},"change_message_id":"f7ad1d1d051c882936221590bd1980759838d488","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"8522774e_854ff2aa","updated":"2022-02-25 11:29:23.000000000","message":"I have read carefully your comments on https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6548\nI agree on the compromise,\nbut we need to agree that the examined flag usage is too hackish and messy, !!\nand we need to find a solution for that later (after 0.12 maybe).\n\nAlso for Cortex-M, we need to reset examined flag if we failed to read the CPUID.","commit_id":"1157795f9f6cea2b9cfad7d92a5e17114bc7a27c"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"51c7a74adb0b7505b83a732ae3ab36b05b5f6e02","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"58f6a902_368dbf26","updated":"2022-08-15 08:17:03.000000000","message":"It\u0027s more than half year since the original change was merged and nobody complained (but me).\nLet\u0027s keep the code as is for 0.12 release to avoid unwanted surprises.","commit_id":"1157795f9f6cea2b9cfad7d92a5e17114bc7a27c"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"68b7f938f619c5062e9edbdd4d4374b162db799d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"85ce1314_bd12fdd7","updated":"2022-09-28 21:54:05.000000000","message":"Looks like my fears were confirmed...\nhttps://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/50590\nopenocd: Can\u0027t flash on various STM32 boards\n\nAlthough changes\n7228: target/cortex_m: try to re-examine under reset in cortex_m_assert_reset() | https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7228\n7229: target/hla_target: try to re-examine under reset in hl_assert_reset() | https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7229\n7230: target: re-examine before arp_waitstate in ocd_process_reset_inner | https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7230\nshould fix problems with \u0027reset halt\u0027 of target running zephyr os, I\u0027m convinced that is not all\nand more problems will follow.","commit_id":"1157795f9f6cea2b9cfad7d92a5e17114bc7a27c"},{"author":{"_account_id":1001242,"name":"Tim Newsome","email":"tim@sifive.com","username":"timsifive"},"change_message_id":"0374a950657d8a48d7dc5c6615097f0a185f5a7e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"15f886a5_f25da5af","updated":"2022-04-11 18:06:13.000000000","message":"The code looks harmless enough. I agree with Tarek that it would be good to go through and make the use of examined consistent.","commit_id":"1157795f9f6cea2b9cfad7d92a5e17114bc7a27c"}]}