)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1000863,"name":"Tarek BOCHKATI","email":"tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com","username":"BouchkatiTarek"},"change_message_id":"7d9d59e04733ca6da5d2ba8e51f247a19e2d9d5a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"45d183e3_6d383be5","updated":"2022-10-19 10:23:35.000000000","message":"Do you have any idea if this will backported to lldb ?","commit_id":"441fb011c3eaee0b5ac0cbf719bdca4ecfa4da11"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"e5880cd8247ad87507971c7e909737fdd2d3249e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"f64e4f48_6b5451bb","updated":"2022-10-16 10:37:09.000000000","message":"The GDB patch you mention is part of gdb-12.1\nWhat happens with older GDB?","commit_id":"441fb011c3eaee0b5ac0cbf719bdca4ecfa4da11"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"aabbf931c6fbbcd053feffe6967cdee5ba923279","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"7de228fb_293f9908","updated":"2022-10-16 10:00:31.000000000","message":"This should go to rc2.\n\nhttps://sourceware.org/git/?p\u003dbinutils-gdb.git;a\u003dblob;f\u003dgdb/features/arm/arm-secext.xml;h\u003d52b2c20a98274a47792a1d928c475c09315d8df3;hb\u003dae7e2f45aa4798be449f282bbf75ad41e73f055e\ndoes not contain stack limit registers. I renamed them with stack pointers but have no idea if gdb developers will not create a new feature for them.","commit_id":"441fb011c3eaee0b5ac0cbf719bdca4ecfa4da11"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000863,"name":"Tarek BOCHKATI","email":"tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com","username":"BouchkatiTarek"},"change_message_id":"7d9d59e04733ca6da5d2ba8e51f247a19e2d9d5a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2714f514_579d1c46","in_reply_to":"c560e8b3_1ab89fb2","updated":"2022-10-19 10:23:35.000000000","message":"I confirm, this change is harmless to old gdb versions","commit_id":"441fb011c3eaee0b5ac0cbf719bdca4ecfa4da11"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"728c204f482b7a44fdb3ee95672203a3880f6803","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c560e8b3_1ab89fb2","in_reply_to":"d050728a_6179a2c7","updated":"2022-10-16 11:01:46.000000000","message":"\u003e What happens with older GDB?\n\nNothing. Older gdb shows all registers regardless of the feature assigned with.\nAnd unwinding over security state change is not implemented.\n\n GNU gdb (GDB) 8.3.0.20190729-git\n ...\n (gdb) i r\n r0             0x0                 0\n ...\n control_ns     0x0                 0\n msp_ns         0x2002ffb8          0x2002ffb8\n psp_ns         0xfffffffc          0xfffffffc\n msp_s          0x30017eac          0x30017eac\n psp_s          0x0                 0x0\n msplim_s       0x0                 0x0\n psplim_s       0x0                 0x0\n msplim_ns      0x0                 0x0\n psplim_ns      0x0                 0x0","commit_id":"441fb011c3eaee0b5ac0cbf719bdca4ecfa4da11"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"8d6146e05d22f12a79c4627e709d958278f1d073","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d050728a_6179a2c7","in_reply_to":"f64e4f48_6b5451bb","updated":"2022-10-16 10:43:48.000000000","message":"No, mistake, it\u0027s not yet merged in a GDB release","commit_id":"441fb011c3eaee0b5ac0cbf719bdca4ecfa4da11"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"a56c0d51b1c870c752129c4c609465c7a781e349","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"8472294c_458b5f4a","updated":"2022-10-30 16:52:26.000000000","message":"All registers with _s and _ns suffix moved to secext feature.","commit_id":"60554d332d20ab750aedd238a1dd4a969774e172"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"2af46a5eb4d21f227aa8bd2b6b09559d52421fc4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"a12377c4_498a1d4a","updated":"2022-11-15 07:44:02.000000000","message":"Antonio,\n\ncan we include the change to rc3? I vote for doing so","commit_id":"60554d332d20ab750aedd238a1dd4a969774e172"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"05f912d3313f0cbfbdc6d3927bae6fe4afd81e9b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"8fc2b293_0e26584d","updated":"2022-11-15 09:56:43.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t see issues, as it apparently doesn\u0027t break anything.\nWhy in rc3? Because even if the GDB that will use this is still not out, if this doesn\u0027t enter in v0.12.0 then v0.13.0 will be much later than GDB.\nAny other reason for rc3?","commit_id":"60554d332d20ab750aedd238a1dd4a969774e172"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"48e42d5bf19313e076d31e41cf5976e1dddccbf3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"93fa4721_09e82621","updated":"2022-11-15 21:39:06.000000000","message":"LGTM\nRemains the question from Tarek: what about lldb? Probably they will copy from gdb to keep aligned their implementation of gdb-remote protocol","commit_id":"60554d332d20ab750aedd238a1dd4a969774e172"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"637c7e246c8eccc1e6a95058d71aca8367b820fe","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"583524ba_8d614ca8","in_reply_to":"8fc2b293_0e26584d","updated":"2022-11-15 10:50:07.000000000","message":"\u003e Why in rc3? Because even if the GDB that will use this is still not out, if this doesn\u0027t enter in v0.12.0 then v0.13.0 will be much later than GDB.\n\u003e Any other reason for rc3?\n\nExactly, just get OpenOCD 0.12 release ready for GDB 13\nI don\u0027t think that the secure extension stuff is highly important, so we can postpone it after 0.12 release if you prefer.","commit_id":"60554d332d20ab750aedd238a1dd4a969774e172"}]}