)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1001036,"name":"Andreas Bolsch","email":"hyphen0break@gmail.com","username":"abmero"},"change_message_id":"36aff489df89c8962fda6811b2147c90fe4adcbd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b0f586ec_23c7201c","updated":"2023-10-06 09:57:36.000000000","message":"Hm, I would simply recommend to use the largest erase block size available (except for mass erase, that\u0027s implemented in SFDP parser already), but as this is only a recommendation but not a strict rule, I think the suggestion is reasonable as is.","commit_id":"83d15e31cd099ff707107318545c9dc3b4f6af7b"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"45a7868b0202f043ac6352488524d54d7ebdd060","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d9e14af0_0dd81105","in_reply_to":"b0f586ec_23c7201c","updated":"2023-10-06 10:38:53.000000000","message":"You\u0027re right, the block count as low as 2 (smallest devices) would be still acceptable for most applications. But might impose problems if user wants some kind of partitioning (no so likely in small devices). Therefore I\u0027d prefer the flash split to at least 16 erase blocks.\nI also set the rule to mostly comply the status quo of the existing table.\nI didn\u0027t checked SFDP algo though.","commit_id":"83d15e31cd099ff707107318545c9dc3b4f6af7b"}]}