)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1002047,"name":"Evgeniy Naydanov","email":"eugnay@gmail.com","username":"en-sc"},"change_message_id":"f0f6ac36acb1180ad480ea81b92ec7df65998671","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"2bcf3af7_e5105743","updated":"2024-11-18 09:58:44.000000000","message":"I believe the patch is misnamed: `set_reg` already had a `COMMAND_HANDLER`.\n\nMoreover, I don\u0027t get the purpose of this particular patch. Is it to stop using `Jim_DictPairs` in OpenOCD codebase so that it is less dependent on Jim TCL? But is `Jim_DictPairs` that much different from `Jim_ListLength/Jim_ListGetIndex` in that regard?\nWhat I mean is, wouldn\u0027t any TCL interpreter provide a similar function? (e.g. TCL provides means to iterate over key-value pairs of a dict: https://www.tcl-lang.org/man/tcl/TclLib/DictObj.htm)","commit_id":"dc1c32cb6936d47d92ce5ecdd2448deabb125133"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"2335119be9b14f13693e862b797a8b5ed01eaf7f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"6a1f926b_2187d408","updated":"2024-11-23 17:58:47.000000000","message":"Odd! This was not supposed t","commit_id":"dc1c32cb6936d47d92ce5ecdd2448deabb125133"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"2335119be9b14f13693e862b797a8b5ed01eaf7f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"4c137137_1c783bff","in_reply_to":"2bcf3af7_e5105743","updated":"2024-11-23 17:58:47.000000000","message":"Odd! This patch was not supposed to be sent out.\nI made this series almost one year ago and never pushed out. In mean time this command was already reworked and my rebase ended with this.\nI will abandon it!","commit_id":"dc1c32cb6936d47d92ce5ecdd2448deabb125133"}]}