)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"5db03e975279989ec6c8fb370998640a2e908901","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"26667291_6265f5a2","updated":"2025-06-19 08:08:38.000000000","message":"Dan, Marc, please go on and give some score!\nI will keep myself neutral this time.","commit_id":"0afaa0b7b5b63ee3b51ee73d0a72a16e5f1927e5"},{"author":{"_account_id":1001810,"name":"Daniel Anselmi","email":"danselmi@gmx.ch","username":"danselmi"},"change_message_id":"57e1d9f4800a39671f899a67740f269e155d54f4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3e3dc9d1_ea6e8dd5","updated":"2025-06-17 20:43:44.000000000","message":"I just checked the two usecases ipdbg-jtag-host and some pld/fpga stuff.\nBoth worked ok!","commit_id":"0afaa0b7b5b63ee3b51ee73d0a72a16e5f1927e5"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"86eb5f40bc5c913412933ef0865df79938438ead","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e284ee14_bd5f972a","updated":"2025-06-19 16:23:26.000000000","message":"I sometime get someone complaining that OpenOCD doesn\u0027t work as expected. Then found that their IDE has already forked one OpenOCD in background that has already grab the TCP port. GDB was connecting to the OpenOCD in background, not to the new one.\nI\u0027m ok with this patch.\n\nIt would be nice to have in the error message an info like \"TCP port already taken by process XXXX\" but, in general, it\u0027s not possible for a process to access the info of other processes. So no way to improve this.","commit_id":"0afaa0b7b5b63ee3b51ee73d0a72a16e5f1927e5"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000687,"name":"Tomas Vanek","display_name":"Tomas Vanek","email":"vanekt@fbl.cz","username":"vanekt"},"change_message_id":"f7554fcac7e4b7f72dfec6fabcb262d86e6f69c8","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"70ff06ea_fa84cc5e","updated":"2025-06-17 12:00:33.000000000","message":"Thanks for looking at it.\n\nMy question is whether the can\u0027t-bind-gdb-socket error should be treated as fatal from the OpenOCD point of view. Of course it is fatal for gdb user, but OpenOCD offers other ports/services to use. I have no strong opinion here.","commit_id":"0afaa0b7b5b63ee3b51ee73d0a72a16e5f1927e5"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000853,"name":"Marc Schink","display_name":"Marc Schink","email":"dev@zapb.de","username":"zapb"},"change_message_id":"3f8ca95aaf993c1bfd3dd9e6d5c28a446474ab91","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"11ccf3c3_27a1e068","in_reply_to":"0891c45c_3c0a112f","updated":"2025-06-17 14:17:51.000000000","message":"Sounds reasonable to me.","commit_id":"0afaa0b7b5b63ee3b51ee73d0a72a16e5f1927e5"},{"author":{"_account_id":1001667,"name":"Jan Matyas","email":"jan.matyas@codasip.com","username":"JanMatCodasip"},"change_message_id":"ef2e2d85b82b27ab9925df026b79e1454923460a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0891c45c_3c0a112f","in_reply_to":"70ff06ea_fa84cc5e","updated":"2025-06-17 12:59:44.000000000","message":"Hi Tomas,\n\nthank you for replying. I was wondering about the same thing. \n\nI would prefer to treat it as fatal for two reasons:\n\n1) If any of the other two main OpenOCD\u0027s servers - telnet and tcl - fail to start, this is already considered fatal now.\n\n2) It is IMO more prudent to fail early than to:\n- let the process (GDB connection) fail at a later point, or\n- ask the user to detect the failure to start the GDB server by other means.","commit_id":"0afaa0b7b5b63ee3b51ee73d0a72a16e5f1927e5"}]}