)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1000438,"name":"R. Diez","email":"rdiez-2006@rd10.de","username":"rdiez"},"change_message_id":"230c31c0e743fdc1914f620536ff17c10f9182e2","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"839ed509_183f7896","updated":"2026-01-11 20:00:50.000000000","message":"I would like to get some feedback about this change too.","commit_id":"f5a507d6225bb1ae13ad49ba55ff7a4af1c9eaaa"},{"author":{"_account_id":1000021,"name":"Antonio Borneo","email":"borneo.antonio@gmail.com","username":"borneoa"},"change_message_id":"864af8d63a30afcfd2b202f33847dd6450c8a847","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"55d3eb94_8b337a79","updated":"2026-01-12 16:26:54.000000000","message":"Thanks for the patch.\nYes, I think this change is required to correctly print incremental log count.\nI also think that `count` should be changed as `unsigned int` to prevent it to overflow and become negative, but this is outside the scope of this change. Maybe to be addressed separately.","commit_id":"f5a507d6225bb1ae13ad49ba55ff7a4af1c9eaaa"}]}