cfi: made som info output debug output
[openocd.git] / src / flash / nor / core.c
index fc020a8a815c5ed4bc585ff098573197498197cc..9a7735375a42ad01b8e16b0ca71db38f67ec1026 100644 (file)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /***************************************************************************
  *   Copyright (C) 2005 by Dominic Rath <Dominic.Rath@gmx.de>              *
- *   Copyright (C) 2007,2008 Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>       *
+ *   Copyright (C) 2007-2010 Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>       *
  *   Copyright (C) 2008 by Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>           *
  *   Copyright (C) 2009 Zachary T Welch <zw@superlucidity.net>             *
  *                                                                         *
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
  * primarily support access from Tcl scripts or from GDB.
  */
 
-struct flash_bank *flash_banks;
+static struct flash_bank *flash_banks;
 
 int flash_driver_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
 {
@@ -54,7 +54,75 @@ int flash_driver_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
 int flash_driver_protect(struct flash_bank *bank, int set, int first, int last)
 {
        int retval;
+       bool updated = false;
+
+       /* NOTE: "first == last" means (un?)protect just that sector.
+        code including Lower level ddrivers may rely on this "first <= last"
+        * invariant.
+       */
+
+       /* callers may not supply illegal parameters ... */
+       if (first < 0 || first > last || last >= bank->num_sectors)
+               return ERROR_FAIL;
+
+       /* force "set" to 0/1 */
+       set = !!set;
+
+       /*
+        * Filter out what trivial nonsense we can, so drivers don't have to.
+        *
+        * Don't tell drivers to change to the current state...  it's needless,
+        * and reducing the amount of work to be done (potentially to nothing)
+        * speeds at least some things up.
+        */
+scan:
+       for (int i = first; i <= last; i++) {
+               struct flash_sector *sector = bank->sectors + i;
+
+               /* Only filter requests to protect the already-protected, or
+                * to unprotect the already-unprotected.  Changing from the
+                * unknown state (-1) to a known one is unwise but allowed;
+                * protection status is best checked first.
+                */
+               if (sector->is_protected != set)
+                       continue;
 
+               /* Shrink this range of sectors from the start; don't overrun
+                * the end.  Also shrink from the end; don't overun the start.
+                *
+                * REVISIT we could handle discontiguous regions by issuing
+                * more than one driver request.  How much would that matter?
+                */
+               if (i == first && i != last) {
+                       updated = true;
+                       first++;
+               } else if (i == last && i != first) {
+                       updated = true;
+                       last--;
+               }
+       }
+
+       /* updating the range affects the tests in the scan loop above; so
+        * re-scan, to make sure we didn't miss anything.
+        */
+       if (updated) {
+               updated = false;
+               goto scan;
+       }
+
+       /* Single sector, already protected?  Nothing to do!
+        * We may have trimmed our parameters into this degenerate case.
+        *
+        * FIXME repeating the "is_protected==set" test is a giveaway that
+        * this fast-exit belongs earlier, in the trim-it-down loop; mve.
+        * */
+       if (first == last && bank->sectors[first].is_protected == set)
+               return ERROR_OK;
+
+
+       /* Note that we don't pass illegal parameters to drivers; any
+        * trimming just turns one valid range into another one.
+        */
        retval = bank->driver->protect(bank, set, first, last);
        if (retval != ERROR_OK)
        {
@@ -441,6 +509,25 @@ static int flash_unlock_address_range(struct target *target, uint32_t addr, uint
                        addr, length, &flash_driver_unprotect);
 }
 
+static int compare_section (const void * a, const void * b)
+{
+       struct imageection *b1, *b2;
+       b1=*((struct imageection **)a);
+       b2=*((struct imageection **)b);
+
+       if (b1->base_address == b2->base_address)
+       {
+               return 0;
+       } else if (b1->base_address > b2->base_address)
+       {
+               return 1;
+       } else
+       {
+               return -1;
+       }
+}
+
+
 int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                uint32_t *written, int erase, bool unlock)
 {
@@ -451,12 +538,6 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
        struct flash_bank *c;
        int *padding;
 
-       /* REVISIT do_pad should perhaps just be another parameter.
-        * GDB wouldn't ever need it, since it erases separately.
-        * But "flash write_image" commands might want that option.
-        */
-       bool do_pad = false;
-
        section = 0;
        section_offset = 0;
 
@@ -474,6 +555,19 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
        /* allocate padding array */
        padding = calloc(image->num_sections, sizeof(*padding));
 
+       /* This fn requires all sections to be in ascending order of addresses,
+        * whereas an image can have sections out of order. */
+       struct imageection **sections = malloc(sizeof(struct imageection *) *
+                       image->num_sections);
+       int i;
+       for (i = 0; i < image->num_sections; i++)
+       {
+               sections[i] = &image->sections[i];
+       }
+
+       qsort(sections, image->num_sections, sizeof(struct imageection *),
+                       compare_section);
+
        /* loop until we reach end of the image */
        while (section < image->num_sections)
        {
@@ -481,11 +575,11 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                uint8_t *buffer;
                int section_first;
                int section_last;
-               uint32_t run_address = image->sections[section].base_address + section_offset;
-               uint32_t run_size = image->sections[section].size - section_offset;
+               uint32_t run_address = sections[section]->base_address + section_offset;
+               uint32_t run_size = sections[section]->size - section_offset;
                int pad_bytes = 0;
 
-               if (image->sections[section].size ==  0)
+               if (sections[section]->size ==  0)
                {
                        LOG_WARNING("empty section %d", section);
                        section++;
@@ -508,7 +602,7 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                while ((run_address + run_size - 1 < c->base + c->size - 1)
                                && (section_last + 1 < image->num_sections))
                {
-                       if (image->sections[section_last + 1].base_address < (run_address + run_size))
+                       if (sections[section_last + 1]->base_address < (run_address + run_size))
                        {
                                LOG_DEBUG("section %d out of order "
                                                "(surprising, but supported)",
@@ -536,14 +630,15 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                        /* if we have multiple sections within our image,
                         * flash programming could fail due to alignment issues
                         * attempt to rebuild a consecutive buffer for the flash loader */
-                       pad_bytes = (image->sections[section_last + 1].base_address) - (run_address + run_size);
+                       pad_bytes = (sections[section_last + 1]->base_address) - (run_address + run_size);
                        if ((run_address + run_size + pad_bytes) > (c->base + c->size))
                                break;
                        padding[section_last] = pad_bytes;
-                       run_size += image->sections[++section_last].size;
+                       run_size += sections[++section_last]->size;
                        run_size += pad_bytes;
 
-                       LOG_INFO("Padding image section %d with %d bytes", section_last-1, pad_bytes);
+                       if (pad_bytes > 0)
+                               LOG_INFO("Padding image section %d with %d bytes", section_last-1, pad_bytes);
                }
 
                /* fit the run into bank constraints */
@@ -588,15 +683,21 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                        size_t size_read;
 
                        size_read = run_size - buffer_size;
-                       if (size_read > image->sections[section].size - section_offset)
-                           size_read = image->sections[section].size - section_offset;
+                       if (size_read > sections[section]->size - section_offset)
+                           size_read = sections[section]->size - section_offset;
+
+                       /* KLUDGE!
+                        *
+                        * #¤%#"%¤% we have to figure out the section # from the sorted
+                        * list of pointers to sections to invoke image_read_section()...
+                        */
+                       int t_section_num = (sections[section] - image->sections) / sizeof(struct imageection);
 
-                       if ((retval = image_read_section(image, section, section_offset,
+                       if ((retval = image_read_section(image, t_section_num, section_offset,
                                        size_read, buffer + buffer_size, &size_read)) != ERROR_OK || size_read == 0)
                        {
                                free(buffer);
-                               free(padding);
-                               return retval;
+                               goto done;
                        }
 
                        /* see if we need to pad the section */
@@ -606,7 +707,7 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                        buffer_size += size_read;
                        section_offset += size_read;
 
-                       if (section_offset >= image->sections[section].size)
+                       if (section_offset >= sections[section]->size)
                        {
                                section++;
                                section_offset = 0;
@@ -625,7 +726,7 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                        {
                                /* calculate and erase sectors */
                                retval = flash_erase_address_range(target,
-                                               do_pad, run_address, run_size);
+                                               true, run_address, run_size);
                        }
                }
 
@@ -639,14 +740,17 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
 
                if (retval != ERROR_OK)
                {
-                       free(padding);
-                       return retval; /* abort operation */
+                       /* abort operation */
+                       goto done;
                }
 
                if (written != NULL)
                        *written += run_size; /* add run size to total written counter */
        }
 
+
+done:
+       free(sections);
        free(padding);
 
        return retval;

Linking to existing account procedure

If you already have an account and want to add another login method you MUST first sign in with your existing account and then change URL to read https://review.openocd.org/login/?link to get to this page again but this time it'll work for linking. Thank you.

SSH host keys fingerprints

1024 SHA256:YKx8b7u5ZWdcbp7/4AeXNaqElP49m6QrwfXaqQGJAOk gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (DSA)
384 SHA256:jHIbSQa4REvwCFG4cq5LBlBLxmxSqelQPem/EXIrxjk gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
521 SHA256:UAOPYkU9Fjtcao0Ul/Rrlnj/OsQvt+pgdYSZ4jOYdgs gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:A13M5QlnozFOvTllybRZH6vm7iSt0XLxbA48yfc2yfY gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:spYMBqEYoAOtK7yZBrcwE8ZpYt6b68Cfh9yEVetvbXg gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ED25519)
+--[ED25519 256]--+
|=..              |
|+o..   .         |
|*.o   . .        |
|+B . . .         |
|Bo. = o S        |
|Oo.+ + =         |
|oB=.* = . o      |
| =+=.+   + E     |
|. .=o   . o      |
+----[SHA256]-----+
2048 SHA256:0Onrb7/PHjpo6iVZ7xQX2riKN83FJ3KGU0TvI0TaFG4 gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (RSA)