in_handler in_check_mask and in_check_value now removed from field. Last big patch...

[openocd.git] / src / target / arm_jtag.c

diff --git a/src/target/arm_jtag.c b/src/target/arm_jtag.c
index 9911f4463ccb2a2e624f7e9d5cf51ce5e1a136c4..ad57cef940198a5e9fd8c28cf8ff4037054ec4c2 100644 (file)
--- a/src/target/arm_jtag.c
+++ b/src/target/arm_jtag.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 #define _ARM_JTAG_SCAN_N_CHECK_
 #endif
 
-int arm_jtag_set_instr(arm_jtag_t *jtag_info, u32 new_instr,  in_handler_t handler)
+int arm_jtag_set_instr(arm_jtag_t *jtag_info, u32 new_instr,  void *no_verify_capture)
 {
        jtag_tap_t *tap;
        tap = jtag_info->tap;
@@ -52,13 +52,20 @@ int arm_jtag_set_instr(arm_jtag_t *jtag_info, u32 new_instr,  in_handler_t handl
                field.num_bits = tap->ir_length;
                field.out_value = t;
                buf_set_u32(field.out_value, 0, field.num_bits, new_instr);
-               
                field.in_value = NULL;
                
-               
-               field.in_handler = handler;
-               
-               jtag_add_ir_scan(1, &field, TAP_INVALID);
+
+
+               if (no_verify_capture==NULL)
+               {
+                       jtag_add_ir_scan(1, &field, TAP_INVALID);
+               } else
+               {
+                       /* FIX!!!! this is a kludge!!! arm926ejs.c should reimplement this arm_jtag_set_instr to
+                        * have special verification code.
+                        */
+                       jtag_add_ir_scan_noverify(1, &field, TAP_INVALID);
+               }
        }
 
        return ERROR_OK;