lpcspifi: assume flash is unprotected after probing 25/1525/2
authorPaul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:15:32 +0000 (20:15 +0400)
committerAndreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:20:35 +0000 (14:20 +0000)
commit3b4a8af80d9cf3fb370c1177c2cf81f9c0a2e5e9
tree0500dca6a9ed9a40020712f1c16608258fde2379
parent421283941b8c5a2a86b34dead635e7f386e2fa5e
lpcspifi: assume flash is unprotected after probing

Since the driver doesn't support any hardware flash protection, it
doesn't make sense to report "protected" status after probing, as it
requires extra commands to unprotect before flashing and might be
confusing for the end-users.

Change-Id: I04d96790cc42412df5334951f39fb6723c972ced
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1525
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
src/flash/nor/lpcspifi.c

Linking to existing account procedure

If you already have an account and want to add another login method you MUST first sign in with your existing account and then change URL to read https://review.openocd.org/login/?link to get to this page again but this time it'll work for linking. Thank you.

SSH host keys fingerprints

1024 SHA256:YKx8b7u5ZWdcbp7/4AeXNaqElP49m6QrwfXaqQGJAOk gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (DSA)
384 SHA256:jHIbSQa4REvwCFG4cq5LBlBLxmxSqelQPem/EXIrxjk gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
521 SHA256:UAOPYkU9Fjtcao0Ul/Rrlnj/OsQvt+pgdYSZ4jOYdgs gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:A13M5QlnozFOvTllybRZH6vm7iSt0XLxbA48yfc2yfY gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:spYMBqEYoAOtK7yZBrcwE8ZpYt6b68Cfh9yEVetvbXg gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ED25519)
+--[ED25519 256]--+
|=..              |
|+o..   .         |
|*.o   . .        |
|+B . . .         |
|Bo. = o S        |
|Oo.+ + =         |
|oB=.* = . o      |
| =+=.+   + E     |
|. .=o   . o      |
+----[SHA256]-----+
2048 SHA256:0Onrb7/PHjpo6iVZ7xQX2riKN83FJ3KGU0TvI0TaFG4 gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (RSA)