From b747da266344ae9f17b5e27a38bbe51e28f00e7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: oharboe Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:49:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] added note w/reference to discussion on whether or not arm11 code is broken or not. git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2580 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60 --- src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c index 5b6188f5af..9e8be889c1 100644 --- a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c +++ b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c @@ -479,6 +479,10 @@ int arm11_run_instr_data_to_core(arm11_common_t * arm11, uint32_t opcode, uint32 * * To disable this code, try "memwrite burst false" * + * FIX!!! should we use multiple TAP_IDLE here or not??? + * + * https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-July/009698.html + * https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-August/009865.html */ tap_state_t arm11_MOVE_DRPAUSE_IDLE_DRPAUSE_with_delay[] = { -- 2.30.2